Allegations of Vote Payment Against Elon Musk Dismissed by Judge

Allegations Against Musk

A lawsuit accusing billionaire Elon Musk of violating the law by giving away $1 million to registered voters has been dismissed by a federal judge. The lawsuit was filed by Aaron Greenspan, a California resident and founder of the company PlainSite, during the summer. Greenspan alleged that Musk was in violation of state laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. In a recent emergency motion, Greenspan claimed that Musk's million-dollar giveaways to voters in swing states were in violation of federal law, which prohibits the payment or offer of payment to individuals to register to vote or vote.

Greenspan's Claims

Greenspan argued that Musk, who has publicly endorsed former President Donald Trump, should not be allowed to continually violate federal law and influence the outcome of the election. He requested that the court order Musk to cease violating the law.

Judge's Decision

On October 22, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney denied the motion. She cited a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which concluded that there must be a relationship between an injury claimed in a motion for injunctive relief and the conduct asserted in the underlying lawsuit. Judge Chesney stated that in this case, the injury claimed was unrelated to the conduct alleged in the complaint and the relief sought therein.

Musk's Defense

Musk's legal team argued that the giveaways were only open to individuals who signed a petition in favor of free speech and the right to bear arms. The petition itself stated that it was only open to registered voters in swing states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The lawyers argued that Greenspan's motion failed for numerous reasons, including lack of standing, no relationship between the requested relief and the plaintiff's complaint, and failure to establish a private right of action under Section 10307(c).

Musk's Giveaways

Musk's political action committee recently gave away $1 million to a man in Wisconsin and another $1 million to a man in Michigan.

Bottom Line

This case highlights the complex issues surrounding political contributions and the potential for allegations of vote buying. It raises questions about what constitutes a violation of election laws and how these laws are interpreted and enforced. What are your thoughts on this matter? Do you agree with the judge's decision? Share your thoughts and this article with your friends. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, delivered every day at 6pm.