Decisive Battles of World War 3: Proxy Wars and the New World Order

Decisive Battles of World War 3: Proxy Wars and the New World Order

Decisive Battles of World War 3

Proxy Wars and the New World Order

Nick Giambruno suggests that the outcome of World War 3 and the shape of the new world order will be determined by proxy wars. He identifies Taiwan, Ukraine, and the Middle East as the most significant battlegrounds, with other areas being of lesser importance. Giambruno predicts that the proxy wars in Ukraine and Taiwan will likely end in favor of the BRICS+ alliance, leading NATO & Friends to make their final stand in the Middle East.

The Middle East: A Tipping Point

The Middle East, according to Giambruno, is on the brink of its largest war in decades. The region is divided into two geopolitical groups. The first includes the US and its allies—Israel, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and others. The second group, known as the Axis of Resistance, comprises Iran, Syria, the Houthis in Yemen, Hezbollah in Lebanon, several Palestinian groups (including Hamas), and an assortment of militias in Iraq, with Russia and China backing them. If a regional war breaks out in the Middle East, it will likely be between these two groups.

The Role of Iran

Iran, the primary sponsor of the Axis of Resistance, does not possess nuclear weapons. This makes it the weak link in the BRICS+ alliance's push for a multipolar world order. Giambruno predicts that NATO & Friends will make their final stand in the Middle East by trying to neutralize the Axis of Resistance.

Current State of Affairs in the Middle East

Giambruno provides a brief overview of the current situations in various areas of the Middle East, including Gaza, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Iran. He concludes that Israel's regional position is deteriorating, Syria will remain a crucial member of the Axis of Resistance, Iraq's geopolitical orientation has tilted towards the Axis of Resistance, the Houthis will likely remain in power in Yemen, and NATO & Friends have few options when it comes to dealing with Iran.

Bottom Line

While NATO & Friends are not in a weak position in the Middle East, Giambruno argues that the geopolitical momentum is with the Axis of Resistance, which is eroding the power and influence of NATO & Friends in the region. If these trends continue, NATO & Friends will have to make a critical decision: either cede the region to BRICS+ and accept the creation of a multipolar world order, or launch a full-scale war with the Axis of Resistance in a last-ditch attempt to prevent the emergence of a multipolar world order. Giambruno believes that there is a good chance that BRICS+ will prevail in the three key proxy wars of World War 3—Ukraine, Taiwan, and the Middle East. This would lead to the end of the unipolar world order and the emergence of a multipolar world order, a change of historical significance that many people will be unprepared for. So, what do you think about this analysis? Do you agree with Giambruno's predictions? Share your thoughts and this article with your friends. And don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.