Geoengineering: A Controversial Solution to Climate Change

The Controversy Surrounding Geoengineering

The topic of climate change is already a contentious issue, but the introduction of geoengineering into the conversation makes it even more so. Some advocates of climate change argue that drastic measures such as spraying chemicals into the atmosphere to cool the earth's climate are the only viable solutions. However, many others, including some who believe in the urgency of climate change, caution that such actions could potentially cause more harm than good.

Understanding Geoengineering

Despite being a concept that has been around for nearly a century, geoengineering remains largely unknown to many. This term, which may sound like something from a science fiction novel, actually dates back to the 1930s. The origins and implications of geoengineering are explored in depth in a revealing documentary called FrankenSkies. The documentary aims to raise awareness about geoengineering, revealing how those with vested interests have sought to normalize the idea of chemical cloud formations through atmospheric aerosol dispersals. This is done so that people will not question what they see happening in the skies above them.

FrankenSkies: A Documentary on Geoengineering

According to the documentary's website, the world has drastically changed since the release of FrankenSkies in June 2017. Many people remain unaware of aerosol injections, chemtrails, and geoengineering, or weather engineering. The website states, "Most importantly, on a global scale and in desperate need of much exposure, is the media normalization, social engineering, and official public deployment of geoengineering as a solution to climate change."

The Motivation Behind FrankenSkies

Matt Landman, the man behind the documentary, was inspired to create it after witnessing strange weather events while working on a farm in California. He noticed that planes would fly overhead, and rainstorms would suddenly stop. After researching this phenomenon and discovering that atmospheric aerosols were being sprayed to prevent rain, he decided to raise public awareness about the issue. Landman's research uncovered what he describes as a "treasonous, nefarious plot to control the weather" and a worse agenda that involves deceiving the public into believing that the planet is heating uncontrollably due to our carbon emissions.

The Stigma Surrounding Geoengineering

Like those who warned about the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines, people who speak out about chemtrails have often been labeled as "conspiracy theorists" in an attempt to discredit them. However, this is a very real phenomenon, and those who support it are not hiding their motivations. Scientists from prestigious institutions like Harvard University argue that spraying sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away is a sensible solution. Meanwhile, scientists from MIT claim that "geoengineering might be our final and only option" to combat climate change.

European Commission's Warning on Geoengineering

However, there is a glimmer of hope: last year, the European Commission published a report warning about the risks associated with using geoengineering to manipulate the skies. This comes as climate change advocates intensify their calls for these artificial interventions. The report cautioned that "the risks, impacts, and unintended consequences that these technologies pose are poorly understood, and necessary rules, procedures, and institutions have not been developed." In addition to the obvious health dangers of spraying chemicals into the air we breathe, the report also highlighted potential issues such as power imbalances between countries that could lead to serious conflicts, as well as ethical and legal problems. Frans Timmermans, the EU Climate Policy Chief, stated, "Nobody should be conducting experiments alone with our shared planet. This should be discussed in the right forum, at the highest international level."

A Final Note

The controversy surrounding geoengineering is a complex issue, with valid arguments on both sides. As we grapple with the urgent issue of climate change, it's important to consider all potential solutions, but also to be aware of the potential risks and consequences. What are your thoughts on this matter? Share this article with your friends and engage in a discussion. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is available every day at 6 pm.