McDonald's Franchise Visited by Trump Hires Private Security Following Threats
The McDonald's outlet in Pennsylvania, where President Trump recently worked a shift, has felt compelled to employ private security due to a flurry of threats. This follows President Trump's stint at the fry station and serving customers at the drive-thru in Bucks County, which resulted in a significant backlash.
Private Security Retained to Protect Staff and Store
Derek Giacomantonio, the owner of the franchise, has decided to keep the private security personnel he initially hired for Trump's visit. This is in response to the threatening messages and calls from individuals upset with the President's visit. Jim Worthington, who coordinated Trump's visit and led the Pennsylvania delegation at the Republican National Convention, revealed that there have been threats made over social media and phone calls.
Local Resident Shares Experience
A resident of Bucks County, who visited the McDonald's with her four sons, shared her experience. She noticed several armed guards in the restaurant and one of them inspecting their car. She eventually realized that these individuals were security personnel, likely hired due to Trump's visit.
Owner Bears the Cost of Security
Worthington mentioned that Giacomantonio, who has chosen to avoid media appearances, is bearing the cost of the security. When asked if he needed help with the expenses, Giacomantonio declined, stating that while it was an unfortunate cost of doing business, he valued his employees and customers enough to bear it.
Despite the threats, the McDonald's branch is thriving. Worthington noted that the community has been very supportive, with many people visiting the restaurant since Sunday to show their support.
Trump's Visit Still a Hot Topic
Trump's visit to the store was so impactful that it's still a topic of discussion in the media, almost a week later.
Bottom Line
The incident at the McDonald's franchise in Pennsylvania highlights the impact of political affiliations on businesses. The owner's decision to bear the cost of private security to ensure the safety of his staff and customers is commendable. However, it raises questions about the extent to which businesses should be prepared to handle such situations. What are your thoughts on this matter? Share this article with your friends and discuss it. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
