Presidential Accountability and the US Constitution
Every president should be held accountable to the US Constitution, a principle that has been reiterated throughout American history. Each president should be held responsible for any direct violations of their oath of office and should be subject to scrutiny by the American public. However, it's noteworthy that the establishment has expended a significant amount of time and energy in pursuing only one president in recent history for alleged constitutional violations, Donald Trump.
It's puzzling why the numerous transgressions committed by the Clintons, the Bush family, Barack Obama, and the Biden/Harris team have been largely overlooked. Why is it that they escape scrutiny while Trump is subjected to intense examination?
The Battle for Constitutional Rights
A few years ago, the American public was engaged in a critical struggle to prevent their constitutional rights from being permanently erased by the Biden Administration and their globalist allies. The Biden administration's efforts to implement vaccine passports were particularly concerning; had they succeeded, the Bill of Rights would have been effectively nullified, giving the federal government total control over every aspect of civilian life.
Under the Biden/Harris administration and the Democrats, Americans faced a future where maintaining employment, accessing public spaces, and avoiding covid camps would be contingent on accepting the latest mRNA booster shot.
The government's response to Covid hysteria is a prime example of fascism, and a large number of Democrats supported these policies. This is why the political left's accusations of Donald Trump being a "literal Hitler" seem disingenuous. They have been acting in an authoritarian manner during their four years in power, and the hypocrisy is palpable.
Harris Compares Trump to Hitler
Kamala Harris recently held a press briefing in which she compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler, a move that seems to signal panic as polling numbers increasingly indicate a landslide victory for Trump in November. In just two weeks, the Democrats face a conservative red wave the likes of which hasn't been seen in decades. It's clear they've run out of strategies to counter this outcome.
Harris' claim that Trump "wants generals like Hitler had" is based on an unverified assertion from Gen. John Kelly, whom Trump fired for incompetence while in office. This is the same man who claimed in 2023 that Trump referred to military casualties as "suckers" and "losers". There is no evidence to substantiate any of Kelly's claims.
The 'Trump is Hitler' Narrative
The corporate media has seized on the narrative that Trump's suggestion to use the National Guard to quell leftist riots is a precursor to a fascist future. However, recalling the BLM riots and burning cities, the idea of National Guard intervention seems reasonable. Military intervention is a different matter and is worth debating. But it's important to remember that there have been at least two nearly successful assassination attempts against Trump by leftists.
It's not far-fetched to suggest that extreme violence from the political left is a possibility if Trump wins. They've demonstrated their capacity for violence on numerous occasions. Many people anticipate a civil war following the 2024 election, a scenario Trump was commenting on.
It's also doubtful that Americans today are as tolerant of mass political violence from leftists as they were four years ago. Trump's frank discussion of the issue is not an endorsement of Hitler or fascism, but a recognition of the unstable times we live in.
The political left, aware of their likely defeat in November, may be signaling their devout followers to resort to violence post-election, using the Hitler narrative as justification. If Trump is "literally Hitler", then all violence is justified, isn't it?
Bottom Line
In the end, it's crucial to remember that every president should be held accountable to the US Constitution. The recent comparison of Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler by Kamala Harris raises questions about the potential for post-election violence and the future of American democracy. What are your thoughts on this matter? Share this article with your friends and join the conversation. Sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
Presidential Accountability and the US Constitution
Every president should be held accountable to the US Constitution, a principle that has been reiterated throughout American history. Each president should be held responsible for any direct violations of their oath of office and should be subject to scrutiny by the American public. However, it's noteworthy that the establishment has expended a significant amount of time and energy in pursuing only one president in recent history for alleged constitutional violations, Donald Trump.
It's puzzling why the numerous transgressions committed by the Clintons, the Bush family, Barack Obama, and the Biden/Harris team have been largely overlooked. Why is it that they escape scrutiny while Trump is subjected to intense examination?
The Battle for Constitutional Rights
A few years ago, the American public was engaged in a critical struggle to prevent their constitutional rights from being permanently erased by the Biden Administration and their globalist allies. The Biden administration's efforts to implement vaccine passports were particularly concerning; had they succeeded, the Bill of Rights would have been effectively nullified, giving the federal government total control over every aspect of civilian life.
Under the Biden/Harris administration and the Democrats, Americans faced a future where maintaining employment, accessing public spaces, and avoiding covid camps would be contingent on accepting the latest mRNA booster shot.
The government's response to Covid hysteria is a prime example of fascism, and a large number of Democrats supported these policies. This is why the political left's accusations of Donald Trump being a "literal Hitler" seem disingenuous. They have been acting in an authoritarian manner during their four years in power, and the hypocrisy is palpable.
Harris Compares Trump to Hitler
Kamala Harris recently held a press briefing in which she compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler, a move that seems to signal panic as polling numbers increasingly indicate a landslide victory for Trump in November. In just two weeks, the Democrats face a conservative red wave the likes of which hasn't been seen in decades. It's clear they've run out of strategies to counter this outcome.
Harris' claim that Trump "wants generals like Hitler had" is based on an unverified assertion from Gen. John Kelly, whom Trump fired for incompetence while in office. This is the same man who claimed in 2023 that Trump referred to military casualties as "suckers" and "losers". There is no evidence to substantiate any of Kelly's claims.
The 'Trump is Hitler' Narrative
The corporate media has seized on the narrative that Trump's suggestion to use the National Guard to quell leftist riots is a precursor to a fascist future. However, recalling the BLM riots and burning cities, the idea of National Guard intervention seems reasonable. Military intervention is a different matter and is worth debating. But it's important to remember that there have been at least two nearly successful assassination attempts against Trump by leftists.
It's not far-fetched to suggest that extreme violence from the political left is a possibility if Trump wins. They've demonstrated their capacity for violence on numerous occasions. Many people anticipate a civil war following the 2024 election, a scenario Trump was commenting on.
It's also doubtful that Americans today are as tolerant of mass political violence from leftists as they were four years ago. Trump's frank discussion of the issue is not an endorsement of Hitler or fascism, but a recognition of the unstable times we live in.
The political left, aware of their likely defeat in November, may be signaling their devout followers to resort to violence post-election, using the Hitler narrative as justification. If Trump is "literally Hitler", then all violence is justified, isn't it?
Bottom Line
In the end, it's crucial to remember that every president should be held accountable to the US Constitution. The recent comparison of Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler by Kamala Harris raises questions about the potential for post-election violence and the future of American democracy. What are your thoughts on this matter? Share this article with your friends and join the conversation. Sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
