
Putin Alters Russia's Nuclear Doctrine Amid Rising Tensions with NATO
Putin's Statement on Nuclear Doctrine
In light of recent developments in Ukraine and the West's deliberation on whether to allow Ukraine forces to attack Russian territory using NATO-provided long-range missiles, Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a significant statement regarding his country's nuclear doctrine. On Wednesday, Putin announced a reduction in the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons by Russian strategic forces. In a televised address to Russia’s Security Council, he stated that the nuclear doctrine has been revised due to the "emergence of new sources of military threats and risks for Russia and our allies." This comes in response to escalated cross-border attacks from Ukraine deep into Russian territory, some of which have threatened Moscow.
Implications of the Revised Nuclear Doctrine
Putin further explained that if Western powers assist another nation in a major attack on Russian soil, they will also be held accountable. This could trigger a Russian nuclear launch, according to the new doctrine, thereby lowering the bar for what can be considered an 'existential threat' against Russia and its people. Putin clarified, "The updated version of the document proposes that aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear-weapon state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear-weapon state, should be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation."
Conditions for Nuclear Response
While Putin did not explicitly state that this would automatically authorize Russia to respond with nuclear weapons, he did assert that the threshold for their use would be met based on "reliable information about a massive launch of aerospace attack means and their crossing of our State border." He also included the defense of Belarus as part of the change, reserving the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus as a member of the Union State.
Details of the Revised Nuclear Doctrine
According to Putin, Moscow would also consider resorting to a nuclear response if it receives reliable information about a massive missile or air strike launched by another state against Russia or its closest ally, Belarus. The weapons used in an enemy’s potential strike could include anything from ballistic or cruise missiles to strategic aircraft and drones.
Timing and International Implications
The timing of this significant alteration in nuclear policy coincides with Ukrainian President Zelensky's visit to the United States, where he is presenting Ukraine's 'victory plan' to President Biden, VP Harris, and Donald Trump. Zelensky has emphasized that a key component of this plan is to have the West lift all restrictions on the use of long-range weapons. Ukraine's long-range cross-border attacks have already caused significant damage, hitting dozens of oil and gas depots, airfields, and ammo storage sites over several months. Zelensky aims to inflict greater damage on Russia directly, in hopes of gaining more leverage for a favorable settlement to the war.
US Response and Future Uncertainties
Despite these developments, President Biden has stated that there has been no change in Washington's policy on this matter. Putin's recent statement is aimed at maintaining pressure on the US and preventing any new approval for Kiev's use of weapons like the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) or British Storm Shadows. However, it remains uncertain what the next administration will do, regardless of who occupies the White House. Trump has been the only candidate to strongly advocate for prioritizing peace negotiations to end the war urgently, while Harris is expected to continue Biden's policies, which have led to an ongoing escalation.
Bottom Line
The recent changes in Russia's nuclear doctrine signal a significant shift in the global military-political landscape. The lowering of the threshold for nuclear response and the potential implications for NATO and other Western powers are matters of grave concern. As the world watches these developments unfold, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences and the importance of diplomatic solutions to these complex issues. What are your thoughts on this matter? Feel free to share this article with your friends and discuss. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6 pm.