The WHO's Defensive Strategy
Historical Context of Square Formation
In the annals of military history, the square formation has been a strategic method for infantry to protect itself against cavalry attacks. This formation places the commanders and the colours in the centre, with weapons pointed outwards to ward off incoming assaults.
Contemporary Application of Square Formation
Recently, we have observed a similar defensive strategy being employed by those who have been responsible for the significant social and economic disruption. These individuals and organizations have attempted to justify their actions, often denying the imposition of their will on the general public.
WHO's Stance on COVID-19 Measures
Dr Tedros, the WHO's director-general, has stated, "The WHO did not impose anything on anyone during the COVID-19 pandemic—not lockdowns, not mask mandates, not vaccine mandates.” This statement seems to contradict his earlier remarks in March 2020 where he emphasized the importance of testing, isolation, and contact tracing as the backbone of the response to the pandemic.
Interpreting the Contradictory Statements
How should we interpret these conflicting statements? Were the initial assertions, which endorsed testing, transmission, and isolation of large numbers of “positives,” meant to be ignored by governments? In practice, these statements were used to justify policies and discredit those who questioned the validity of these assertions and the evidence supporting them.
Implications of Compliance
While there was no direct enforcement of vaccination or mask-wearing, compliance was necessary for participation in society. If you wanted your children to attend school and avoid further isolation, vaccination, social distancing, and mask-wearing became the norm.
Changing Recommendations and Public Trust
When the WHO altered its advice on face masks, recommending their use in public settings where social distancing was not feasible, it raised questions about the organization's credibility and responsibility in providing healthcare advice. Does the WHO Director-General understand the implications of urging the world to “Test Test Test,” without considering the repercussions of his declarations?
The Long-term Consequences
The WHO and its representatives are defending their actions, akin to a square formation in battle. However, it will be challenging to evade the consequences of their actions and statements in the long run.
Current WHO Position
In his most recent statement, Tedros asserts that the WHO’s “job is to support governments with evidence-based guidance advice.” But is there a plan to address the numerous evidence gaps in the over 200 measures that were implemented?
Bottom Line
This article was penned by two individuals who, upon hearing or seeing Dr Tedros, choose to distance themselves. They apologize for the repetition of the clip, but they believe it's crucial to highlight why public health organizations have lost the trust of the people they are meant to serve. What are your thoughts on this matter? Do share this article with your friends and consider signing up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6 pm.
