Unveiling Hidden Aspects of Harris-Trump Debate and Hollywood Influence

Unveiling Hidden Aspects of Harris-Trump Debate and Hollywood InfluenceUnveiling the Hidden Aspects of the Harris-Trump Debate Penned by James Howard Kunstler's substack, this piece delves into the lesser-known aspects of the recent Harris-Trump debate. The debate has been a hot topic of discussion, but this article aims to shed light on some overlooked points.

The Hollywood Connection

Hollywood's involvement in Kamala Harris's campaign is more than just celebrity endorsements like George Clooney, Taylor Swift, and John Legend. Jeffrey Katzenberg and Steven Spielberg, two prominent Hollywood figures, are reportedly managing things behind the scenes at Kamala Central. This means that the news about Kamala Harris is presented in a manner reminiscent of a Spielberg movie.

Debate Performance

During the debate, Harris had the advantage of speaking in clear, declarative sentences, which gave her the appearance of being intelligent. However, the article argues that her statements were either disingenuous or outright lies. One significant untruth was her claim of being in the US Capitol building during the J-6 riot. In reality, she was moved to the Democratic National Committee's headquarters building hours before the riot due to a pipe bomb threat. The article suggests that the plan was to disrupt the election certification process by creating a commotion over the bomb threat.

Missed Opportunities

The article criticizes Trump for missing several opportunities to challenge Harris on her lies and hypocrisies. For example, he failed to point out that she had never visited the Mexican border despite her designated title, or that she was selected as the nominee without a vote, which is an affront to democracy.

The Road Ahead

With the debate over, the focus shifts to the upcoming election. Despite her ability to speak in clear sentences and create a joyful atmosphere, Harris's poll numbers are falling due to her avoidance of unscripted interactions with the press. The article concludes by highlighting the concerning development of the government pushing to start World War Three before the election. It suggests that any missiles fired into Russia will be done by NATO personnel, and that Russia will likely retaliate.

Bottom Line

This article provides a unique perspective on the recent Harris-Trump debate, highlighting overlooked aspects and questioning the narratives presented by both candidates. It also raises concerns about the potential for escalating conflict with Russia. What do you think about these points? Do you agree with the author's perspective? Share this article with your friends and continue the discussion. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6 pm.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.