Comparing Metro Systems Across European Capital Cities

The Importance of Metro Systems

Metro stations are a vital part of urban life, but their quality and level of modernization can greatly differ across Europe’s capital cities. High-quality transportation networks are key to driving business productivity as they enhance mobility and provide access to a wider labor pool. Furthermore, investment in metro systems is linked to higher foreign direct investment, which can boost a city’s appeal by improving commuting speed and accessibility.

Ranking Methodology

This analysis, provided by Visual Capitalist's Dorothy Neufeld, ranks the metro systems of European capital cities based on data from Bounce. The metro systems across 19 European capital cities were scored according to the following metrics: - Number of stations - Annual ridership - Distance covered - Google review scores - The share of positive and negative online reactions to articles about each metro system Due to travel advisories, Belarus, Ukraine, and Russian capitals were excluded. Metro systems were measured out of a score of 10.

Norway's Top-Ranked Metro System

Oslo, the capital of Norway, tops the list with 101 metro stations across its transit network. In 2023, it became the first metro system in the world to operate entirely on electric power. As the largest network in Scandinavia, Oslo’s metro stations earned an average Google review score of 4.13 out of 5 stars, with users often saying they were “very well organized” and “easy to get around”.

Other Notable Metro Systems

Sofia, Bulgaria, claims second place with the newest metro system among European capitals, established in 1998. On the other hand, the London Underground, built in 1863, holds the title of the world’s oldest metro system. Today, the London Underground emits 84% fewer carbon emissions per passenger than a gasoline car, and it’s on track to be fully powered by renewables by 2030. Overall, London’s metro system ranks sixth among European capitals. Copenhagen’s automated metro runs 24/7, with trains arriving every two minutes during most of the day. Despite placing seventh on the list, it is frequently recognized as the world’s best metro system due to its exceptional reliability.

Lowest-Ranked Metro System

At the other end of the spectrum, Budapest’s metro system ranks last, with 75% of online reactions to transport-related news articles being negative. Passengers have described some metro stations as “rather unpleasant,” with cleanliness often cited as a major concern.

Global Transportation Perspectives

For a global perspective on this topic, consider exploring a graphic on different transportation methods around the world.

Bottom Line

Metro systems play a crucial role in urban life and business productivity, but their quality and modernization levels can vary greatly. While some cities, like Oslo and Sofia, have highly rated metro systems, others, like Budapest, have room for improvement. What are your thoughts on these rankings? Do you agree with the assessment of these metro systems? Share this article with your friends and discuss. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is available every day at 6pm.