Federal Review Raises Concerns About Pro-Censorship Advertiser Alliance's Billion-Dollar Contracts

Federal Review Raises Concerns About Pro-Censorship Advertiser Alliance's Billion-Dollar Contracts

Federal Review Raises Questions About Billions in Contracts to Pro-Censorship Advertiser Alliance

Advertiser Alliance Accused of Online Censorship

It seems that some members of the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), an advertising group affiliated with the World Economic Forum (WEF), stand accused of aiding and abetting online censorship. Ironically, these same members are receiving funding from the very US taxpayers whose freedom of speech they are allegedly working to suppress.

Concerns Over "Dangerous" and "Sham" Practices

A federal review has raised concerns about the billions in contracts being awarded to these members of the pro-censorship advertiser alliance. The practices of these members have been deemed "dangerous" and a "sham".

Bottom Line

It's a thought-provoking situation when the very entities accused of suppressing free speech are funded by the individuals whose rights they may be infringing. It raises serious questions about the role of such alliances and the power they wield. What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe it's a conflict of interest? We'd love to hear your views. Share this article with your friends and spark a conversation. Remember, you can sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered to your inbox every day at 6pm.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.

Some articles will contain credit or partial credit to other authors even if we do not repost the article and are only inspired by the original content.