The Omniwar Symposium: A Global War on Humanity
The Omniwar Symposium, a gathering of learned and articulate presenters, discussed a variety of topics including transhuman ambition and religious inversion. The central thesis of the symposium was the concept of an all-encompassing assault by elite powers on mass populations. This global war, according to the presenters, is a struggle to establish a technocratic hegemony and is seen as a war against humanity.
The symposium was largely a response to the traumatic Covid measures implemented globally. The presenters argued that in the United States, for example, people saw their rights trampled upon as corporations and the federal government forced vaccination under threat of unemployment. Lives were disrupted and family ties were broken, leading the presenters to label these measures as a crime against human dignity.
The Role of Technocracy and Transhumanism
One of the participants in the symposium was Patrick Wood, who has extensively researched technocracy and transhumanism. He traced the history of the technocracy movement back to its origins at Columbia University and highlighted its continued relevance today. He quoted a 1937 issue of The Technocrat, which defined technocracy as "the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population."
Wood argued that the Covid crackdown was inherently technocratic, with governments using data to enforce lockdowns and neutralize protests. He also drew a clear distinction between technocracy and communism, stating that Marxists hated technocracy because it would push humans out of the picture, leading to a scientific dictatorship run by scientists and engineers.
The Threat of Nanotechnology
One of the most contentious topics discussed at the symposium was the potential threat of nanotechnology. Some participants suggested that Covid vaccines and possibly chemtrails contain sophisticated nanobots that can be activated by 5G routers to monitor or manipulate a person's body and brain.
However, this theory remains controversial and unproven. A commentary published by the International Journal of Vaccine Practice, Theory, and Research stated there are "No Nanobots in Vaccines - Just Lipids on the Loose." Despite this, the idea of nanobots in vaccines has already caused significant psychological damage and generated substantial clickbait revenue.
The Sociological Implications of Technocracy
Daniel Broudy, another participant in the symposium, focused on the broader sociological implications of technocracy. He argued that our leaders treat us like cattle, using surveillance and mind control to manipulate the masses. However, he also acknowledged that not all technocrats and transhumanists are atheists, and that these distinctions will be important going forward.
Broudy also quoted Bertrand Russell's essay "Scientific Technique in an Oligarchy," which highlighted the potential dangers of scientific totalitarianism. Russell wrote, "Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible."
Bottom Line
The Omniwar Symposium presented a thought-provoking discussion on the potential threats posed by technocracy, transhumanism, and nanotechnology. However, it's important to remember that while these theories may be compelling, they remain unproven and controversial.
What are your thoughts on the topics discussed at the Omniwar Symposium? Do you believe in the existence of nanobots in vaccines, or do you think this is just a conspiracy theory? Share your thoughts with your friends and consider signing up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
The Omniwar Symposium: A Global War on Humanity
The Omniwar Symposium, a gathering of learned and articulate presenters, discussed a variety of topics including transhuman ambition and religious inversion. The central thesis of the symposium was the concept of an all-encompassing assault by elite powers on mass populations. This global war, according to the presenters, is a struggle to establish a technocratic hegemony and is seen as a war against humanity.
The symposium was largely a response to the traumatic Covid measures implemented globally. The presenters argued that in the United States, for example, people saw their rights trampled upon as corporations and the federal government forced vaccination under threat of unemployment. Lives were disrupted and family ties were broken, leading the presenters to label these measures as a crime against human dignity.
The Role of Technocracy and Transhumanism
One of the participants in the symposium was Patrick Wood, who has extensively researched technocracy and transhumanism. He traced the history of the technocracy movement back to its origins at Columbia University and highlighted its continued relevance today. He quoted a 1937 issue of The Technocrat, which defined technocracy as "the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population."
Wood argued that the Covid crackdown was inherently technocratic, with governments using data to enforce lockdowns and neutralize protests. He also drew a clear distinction between technocracy and communism, stating that Marxists hated technocracy because it would push humans out of the picture, leading to a scientific dictatorship run by scientists and engineers.
The Threat of Nanotechnology
One of the most contentious topics discussed at the symposium was the potential threat of nanotechnology. Some participants suggested that Covid vaccines and possibly chemtrails contain sophisticated nanobots that can be activated by 5G routers to monitor or manipulate a person's body and brain.
However, this theory remains controversial and unproven. A commentary published by the International Journal of Vaccine Practice, Theory, and Research stated there are "No Nanobots in Vaccines - Just Lipids on the Loose." Despite this, the idea of nanobots in vaccines has already caused significant psychological damage and generated substantial clickbait revenue.
The Sociological Implications of Technocracy
Daniel Broudy, another participant in the symposium, focused on the broader sociological implications of technocracy. He argued that our leaders treat us like cattle, using surveillance and mind control to manipulate the masses. However, he also acknowledged that not all technocrats and transhumanists are atheists, and that these distinctions will be important going forward.
Broudy also quoted Bertrand Russell's essay "Scientific Technique in an Oligarchy," which highlighted the potential dangers of scientific totalitarianism. Russell wrote, "Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible."
Bottom Line
The Omniwar Symposium presented a thought-provoking discussion on the potential threats posed by technocracy, transhumanism, and nanotechnology. However, it's important to remember that while these theories may be compelling, they remain unproven and controversial.
What are your thoughts on the topics discussed at the Omniwar Symposium? Do you believe in the existence of nanobots in vaccines, or do you think this is just a conspiracy theory? Share your thoughts with your friends and consider signing up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
